GitHub / Pull request reviews

Closed beta

A useful second look

Your engineering
agent.
Remembers.

Careful pull request reviews in GitHub.
Sigma checks potential issues and brings
the evidence back to your code.

From our own codebase.

A second look.
A real catch.

An early Sigma review on our Memory MCP Server: a missing ownership check, the author’s fix, and a recheck — all in one public thread.

Follow the review on GitHub

Shortened here for readability.
The full reasoning and discussion are public.

Early review · PR #178Mnemoverse Memory MCP Server
Sigma Charlie v4

The finding Summary

An issue title isn’t
proof of ownership.

Anyone could open an issue with the expected title. The release workflow could then adopt it as its own tracker.

Read Sigma’s finding
The author’s fixdfd072f

Check who opened it.

issue?.user?.type === "Bot" &&
issue?.user?.login ===
  "github-actions[bot]" &&
Added checks · excerpt from isWaveIssue

Sigma · Rechecked

“Agent-adjudicated outcome: fixed.”
Read the recheck

Start small.
Stay in your flow.

One repository. One pull request.
A useful place to begin.

  1. 01

    Follow your invitation.

    Sign in with the GitHub account named in your invitation.

  2. 02

    Choose a repository.

    Start with reviews on request. You choose when Sigma takes a look.

  3. 03

    Ask for a review.

    Comment /sigma review on a pull request. The result comes back to GitHub.

Try Sigma.
On your project.

Tell us what you’d like to try.
We’ll be in touch when there’s a place.

A request does not grant access automatically.

Already invited?

For your first visit, open your invitation link.

Request beta access

We’ll only use these details to respond. Privacy